Pro Life in TN

My photo
Pro Life thoughts in a pro choice world through the eyes of a convert. I took early retirement after working in the social work and Human Resources fields but remain active by being involved in pro life education, lobbying and speaking .

Adoption

Adoption
Showing posts with label Vanderbilt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vanderbilt. Show all posts

Monday, August 12, 2013

Vandy doc oppose requiring standards for outpatient abortion surgery centers as too expensive !!



What an outrageous statement from Dr. Frank H. Boehm professor and vice chairman of the department of OB/GYN at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

In this Op Ed for the abortion supporting Tennessean, Dr. Boehm identifies himself as an abortion supporter/provider who supports limiting late term abortions and agrees with the TX portion of the law that does so. He stated that if the mother's life is in danger, they can deliver the baby and turn the baby over to doctor's who tries to save the life of the baby. So much for the argument that to save the life of the mother...baby must die.

But this paragraph dismissing the need for free standing abortion centers to meet the same standards as other outpatient surgical treatment center is astonishing. Can you say profits before women's health and life?


"There have been attempts by individual states such as Texas to add other restrictions to the abortion process, such as requiring a physician who performs abortions to have admitting privileges in a nearby hospital and requiring abortion clinics to comply with the same structural requirements as an outpatient hospital facility, a requirement that would clearly be so expensive it would cause the majority of abortion clinics in Texas to close their doors."
If they are not meeting standards, closing is not a bad thing?  Why would an abortion center have to have hallways wide enough for a gurney to fit down? Ask the paramedics in the Gosnell case as they tried to save the life of the woman dying from a botched abortion? Paramedics have stated that the narrow hallways prevent the speedy transport of a woman to the waiting ambulance. In fact they say that it needs to be wide enough not only for a gurney but for the paramedic running alongside the gurney "bagging" the patient to have a reasonable chance of survival. These are not cosmetic changes.

 Would you want to have any type of surgery done at a facility that failed to meet these basic standards because it cut into their bottom line? How about qualified doctors who have admitting privileges at local hospitals. If the doctor who wants to perform surgery on me does not meet that standard, I don't want his/her services. How outrageous that a doctor would side with the abortion industry in putting profits before the safety and health of the women they pro port to serve.  

Pix: Tennessean

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Baby reaches our during C section.....

What does this remind you of?  

This reminds me of baby Samuel during surgery at Vanderbilt Hospital in Nashville in 1999. Fellow Tennessean and photojournalist Michael Clancy took an amazing   picture  of a baby at  21 weeks gestation during the operation to repair spina bifida. Instead of being heralded for his great picture, he was chastised and called a liar by the attending doctor and the hospital. Visit his website michaelclancy.com to see his story. 

But here is a similar story....  this baby was in the process of being born by C section when she reached out and squeezed the hand of the doctor.

Welcome to the world....Nevaeh which is heaven spelled backwards...




Saturday, September 10, 2011

One student takes a stand and Vanderbilt blinks....

For such a time as this.....one young lady aspiring to be a nurse and working hard to get through a competitive and expensive university takes a stand for life realizing she is risking it all. Vanderbilt University in Nashville is well known to be a liberal pro abortion bastion. But this may be changing due to people like Anne Marie Dust. Always pro life,  she was concerned that the nursing classes presumed that everyone was in favor of abortion rights something she felt was in conflict with the ideals of nursing...."to care for people and not kill them."
“In my nursing classes, it was assumed that if you were ‘for’ women’s health you were not also pro-life. In college classes in general, the pro-life point of view was not even given consideration in my classes or campus affairs.”
Anne Marie had worked hard and earned excellent grades but when completing her written  application for nursing school, she saw that she was  required  to certify in writing that she would agree to participate in abortions.  She felt it was time to take a stand.  And take a stand she did and with the help of Alliance Defense Fund caused the university to back down. Being a Nashvillian, I watched as the University denied this only to quietly drop that requirement from their application. Victory for life and the people who choose to enter the profession of healing not killing.
For Anne Marie, taking a stand was not about politics, or religion, but about “addressing what is best for women”.
It was around this time that a group invited me to Vanderbilt to do a training on the art of pro life persuasion. I accepted but wondered about the reception since I was keenly aware of  the nature of this college. I was pleasantly surprised at the response and so happy to see a strong organization of faith on campus. This happened to be a Catholic group that invited me. Once again, my hat is off to the youth.


To watch a video about Anne-Marie’s struggle with Vanderbilt, click here.



Thursday, February 10, 2011

Vanderbilt lauded in study for pioneering fetal surgery for spina bifida....

 This story caught my eye as a pro life blogger. I have had the privilege many times of hearing Michael Clancy tell the amazing story behind this photo and the lengths the pro abortion crowd went to trying to discredit what you are seeing with your own eyes. This routine assignment changed his heart and mind on the issue of abortion. Unfortunately it ended his career as a photo journalist as the pro abortion personnel connected with Vanderbilt sought to discredit him and this picture. For full story go to Michael Clancy.com.
So this story in the paper today only touches on the controversy but while the story applauds Vanderbilt in the tenacity of pioneering fetal surgery to correct or at least limit defects from spina bifida there is a pro life message as well.  From the mother who underwent  this surgery, her pro life "shout out" over rides the theme of kudos to Vanderbilt.  Not to belittle the scientific credit to Vandy but the pro life message even comes out even when  not intended. Watch the video at the end and hear the docs refer to the "fetus" as the baby and refer to the heartbeat still being strong.

"Vindication has come for the doctors at Vanderbilt University Medical Center who pioneered fetal surgery for spina bifida and the Mt. Juliet mother who was brave enough to be the first to undergo the procedure.
But it was a photograph that caused a public controversy. Michael Clancy, a freelance photographer on assignment for USA TODAY, was photographing surgery on a 21-month-old fetus in 1999 when the baby's arm emerged from the womb. The shot was a powerful image — one that abortion opponents embraced.
Questions about abortion have been a background issue from the beginning.
"Our first decision was, 'Are we going to keep this child?' — which really wasn't a decision in my mind," Meyer said. "There was no choice. I was going to keep him."
Some women do choose to have abortions when they learn the fetus they carry has been diagnosed with a birth defect.
Kristie Terrell, who underwent prenatal surgery seven years ago so her son, Evan, would have a better chance at life, hopes the news about the study will persuade fewer women to choose abortions when they receive the spina bifida diagnosis.
I hope that maybe this story will give hope to another mom that may be facing this type of issue," Kristie Terrell said. "They will know that baby will bring such joy and such fun to any family that they will consider only the prospect of a future with that baby."

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Tennessean: article dismisses ADF complaint against Vanderbilt....Update Vandy changes policy one day after ADF files complaint

Update: 8:21 PM 1-12-11....great news. Vanderbilt has decided to abandon the policy that they deny having in the first place. Per this story
Vandy has had a change of heart. 
ADF said they will be "monitoring the situation to make sure the university continues to comply with the law. It’s ironic that Vanderbilt changed its policy one day after denying that it required the pledge.”

Tennessean has an article responding to the Alliance Defense Fund's complaint.  I posted about it here. The Tennessean never has hidden their support of abortion.  They start off with the facts but then find two lawyers who say that ADF does not have much of a case because....Vandy does have a non discrimination policy.....which by the way is not stated in the acknowledgment but of course students are supposed  to just know that I guess.  The spokesman for Vandy says this is just to inform the applicants that they may be providing care to a woman who has had an abortion or  is seeking one. Here is the wording...what does it say to you? I think ADF is right when they say this is their way of screening out pro life personnel and a violation of their rights. The two lawyers they trot out for their article indicate that the wording in the required acknowledgment may not be the best but if they do not actually force someone  to participate in an abortion against their conscience they do not actually break the law. Pretty lame Vandy. Here is the actual wording...I think it is pretty clear that pro life nurses are not to apply and there is no advising of legal rights of conscience. No dice Vandy
Applicants to the nursing program's women's health track are required to sign an acknowledgment stating, "I am aware that I may be providing nursing care for women who are having" procedures including terminations of pregnancy.
"It is important that you are aware of this aspect of care and give careful consideration to your ability to provide compassionate care to women in these situations," the acknowledgment states. "If you feel you cannot provide care to women during this type of event, we encourage you to apply to a different track of the Nurse Residency Program to explore opportunities that may best fit your skills."

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

TN Vanderbilt currently forces nursing students to sign pledge to participate in abortion in violation of conscience and the current law



NASHVILLE — "The Alliance Defense Fund filed a complaint Tuesday with the Department of Health and Human Services against Vanderbilt University for requiring nursing residents to participate in abortion procedures. Vanderbilt receives more than $300 million in federal tax dollars each year, and federal law prohibits grant recipients from forcing students or health care workers to participate in abortions contrary to their religious beliefs or moral convictions."

“Christians and other pro-life members of the medical community shouldn’t be forced to participate in abortions to pursue their profession,” said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “People enter the medical profession to protect and heal the helpless. Federal law protects them from being required to kill the helpless. The law clearly states that grant recipients cannot accept taxpayer dollars and require health care workers to participate in abortions, which is precisely what Vanderbilt is doing.”
“We repeatedly see universities and other users of taxpayer dollars tell students and staff that they must submit to the institution’s preferred ideology or take a hike,” said ADF Senior Counsel David French. “What many of these institutions truly want--besides money--are people who share their leftist political and social views.”

Saturday, September 18, 2010

TN: Vanderbilt Dr. makes weak claim for federal funding of Embryonic stem cell research...they are going to die anyway!

Dr. Frank H. Boehm, a pro­fes­sor and vice chair­man of Van­der­bilt Uni­ver­sity Med­ical Center’s Depart­ment of Obstet­rics and Gyne­col­ogy pens an opinion piece for the compliant and left leaning Tennessean on ESCR.   He should have started off with a disclaimer that he is an employee of Vanderbilt who will losing millions of dollars of federal funds unless the law is changed on this issue.  He starts off with a story about  11th cen­tury, reli­gious lead­ers warning  that treat­ing ill­ness with med­i­cine demon­strated a lack of faith in God. Well, that is not a good example, but of course he was trying to say those who oppose ESCR are ignorant.  By treating the illness you were not causing the death of one individual ,no matter how small, to do research in the hopes of improving the life of another. Here are some of his points.


While I respect those indi­vid­u­als who con­sider har­vest­ing stem cells from embryos akin to abor­tion, I am also mind­ful of the axiom that is spo­ken by trans­plant sur­geons, “Don’t bury organs, trans­plant them to save lives.” This slo­gan can be used by those who sup­port research on human embry­onic stem cells.
There is no ques­tion that frozen embryos rep­re­sent poten­tial life and unfrozen embryos rep­re­sent end of life, but we no longer live in the 11th or 18th cen­tury. We need to come to terms with the real­iza­tion that although dis­card­ing embryos may be con­sid­ered a form of death by some, using embry­onic stem cells for research can mean life for others.

His biggest argument is that the embryos are going to die so why not try to get some good out of them. Scott Klusendorf uses a simple example to that tired argument.  Why not take the prisoners on death row who are destined to die and kill them for their organs....the argument is the same. They are condemned to death....all appeals exhausted, then kill them and use their organs. For those who say this is a religious or moral argument in disguise.....science must always answer moral arguments.

From Klusendorf:
Consider President Obama’s own justification for funding embryonic stem cell research. He’s repeatedly told the nation that ideology should not interfere with scientific progress.
Really? First, the claim that ideology should not get in the way of science is itself an ideological claim — and a highly controversial one at that. Second, if he is correct that scientific progress trumps morality, one can hardly condemn Hitler for grisly medical experiments on Jews. Nor can one criticize the Tuskegee experiments of the 1940s in which black men suffering from syphilis were promised treatment, only to have it denied so scientists could study the disease. Pro-life advocates are not anti-science. We are not anti-cures. We just insist that scientific progress be tied to moral truth.
photo credit: Tennessean


Friday, September 3, 2010

Spin machine in full force to keep the $$ flowing for ESCR

 Jill Stanek wrote an informative post with some inside information gleaned from a conference  call from  the  White House, Dept. of Justice, and National Institutes of Health  to liberal supporters and beneficiaries of federally funded embryonic stem cell research. The WH operatives told them to start the publicity machine going to get support for ESCR and purport   great public support. This is contrast to recent Rasmussen Report showing 57% OPPOSE funding of ESCR. They are encouraged to  get the spin going....

The local paper, The Tennessean, wrote a headline story last Sunday entitled 
Stem Cells: From researcher to plaintiff, TN enmeshed in embryo debate.
Actually it should have said embryonic stem cells but that is customary with print stories...often the author is not up to speed on the issue or deliberately seek to confuse/influence with the slight of hand on the words or it could be a space thing...but the story was pretty balanced.  On to my point, they tell how Vanderbilt in Nashville is  significantly hurt  by this court decision which they said hit them by surprise..gosh don't they have lawyers over there that can read the law???   Obama, the constitutional law professor, signs the appropriations bill including the Dickey Wicker amendment banning the use of federal funds for the destruction of ESCR two days after his much publicized Executive Order authorizing the use of federal funds for ESCR.....so I guess I should not be so hard on Vandy lawyers if even the POTUS does  it. But anyway the article points out how upset Vandy is with the loss of the very lucrative income from federal funding.... once you get plugged into the public trough, the good times just keep on rolling.
"The impact of the court statement is becoming painfully clear," said Dr. Mark Magnuson, director of the Vanderbilt Center for Stem Cell Biology. "Unless it is reversed, we will likely need to cease any and all work that involves the use of human embryonic stem cells. Already, we have halted all of our own experimental plans."
Vanderbilt also could have to suspend adult stem cell studies if any research equipment used was purchased with federal grant money for embryonic stem cells.

Today the liberal  Tennessean complied  by publishing an  editorial   from Stephen S. Ent­man, M.D., is pro­fes­sor emer­i­tus, obstet­rics and gyne­col­ogy, at Van­der­bilt Uni­ver­sity Med­ical Center. It was pretty weak in evidence and vague  but of course it was meant to rally support for spending tax money on ESCR for unrealized  cures but building  hopes for cures to come. He glosses over the fact that the embryo must be destroyed to get their  stem cells and with a courtesy nod to the life begins at conception "belief"  ...goes on with his half hearted comments. I almost felt like he got the assignment from someone on the conference call  to get the advocacy going since they benefited so handsomely from the funding.
The embryos that are avail­able for research will never achieve life beyond their cur­rently frozen state; the other options are dis­mal — or worse.
Nation­ally, there are tens of thou­sands of frozen embryos. Nobody really has a pre­cise count.
Alas, today Politico is running a story  about DeGettte (D CO) trying to rush through a bill permitting funding for ESCR. She is working to see that "pro life Dems" won't raise objections...unfortunately that is not too hard to get as we saw from the Obamacare vote. She hopes that this will help the Dems in the upcoming election and even says they will paint the opponents as extremists. She says the stars are aligned in her favor. Hmmmm ....isn't that something Obama said during the campaign. Maybe she was getting her talking points from the conference call from the WH and NIH.




Monday, August 30, 2010

Tennessean: Tennessee enmeshed in embryonic stem cell fight

Sunday's Tennessean featured this article on ESCR . Vanderbilt is on one side wanting federal money for their research. No mention of the fact that private funding is allowed. It is federal money they really want because once you turn on that facet, it never seems to get turned off.

 The article did mention in Dickey Wicker Amendment that originated in 1995 under Clinton but failed to mention that Obama signed the annual appropriations bill  including the Dickey Amendment two days after his much heralded Executive Order allowing for federal funding. It is almost comical that two days after the infamous EO he signed a bill that upheld the provision that federal funding NOT be used to destroy embryos for research. No one argues that the embryo is destroyed to get the stem cells but the govt. and those who seek to profit from it like Vanderbilt want to argue that the amendment does not apply to research on embryonic stem cells because they are not embryos. The good judge sees it differently.
"After filing a federal lawsuit 18 months ago, the Tennessee-based Christian Medical and Dental Association and others involved in the suit are cheering the recent court injunction as a victory on moral ground. "It's not a matter of if we should be doing regenerative medicine research; it is a question of where we get the stem cells," said Dr. David Stevens, chief executive officer of the representative group for 17,000 medical professionals, headquartered in Bristol in the northeast corner of Tennessee. "We crossed the line of ethical medicine." Opponents believe destroying an embryo to harvest its stem cells is the equivalent of taking a human life. They point to adult stem cells, taken from a living donor, as a more ethical alternative."
"Many opponents of embryonic stem cell research, including the National Embryo Donation Center in Knoxville, believe scientists should focus on developing cures from adult stem cells. They also support studying induced pluripotent cells, which are adult stem cells modified to behave like embryonic ones."Adult and induced pluripotent stem cells are now being used to treat or investigate more than 70 disease conditions, compared to only one clinical trial with embryonic stem cells," said Dr. Jeffrey Keenan, medical director of the National Embryo Donation Center. That clinical trial, involving therapy for spinal cord injuries, began last year."

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

No hooking up, no sex for some coeds

 What an interesting column....I have a reader who is faithful to comment under anonymous...always to disagree with my postings....of course. She made some unfavorable comments about Bristol Palin recommending abstinence since she has already had a baby.  She thought is quite unlikely to refrain once you have been active but this column points out that even in very secular environments this is being done.  Brave young lady to tell her story and I commend her. She a lovely young lady.


From CNN.com Living section
as posted by CatholicVoteAction.org



* While hook-up culture dominates campuses, some students are choosing not to participate

* Studies: At least 75 percent of college students have participated in hook-up culture

* Love and Fidelity Network provides colleges with materials to discuss alternatives to hooking up

* Since 2007, there are at least 12 colleges participating in Love and Fidelity Network



Nashville, Tennessee (CNN) -- Almost every weekend, there is a tradition called raging at Vanderbilt University.


It's a recurring, drunken activity that isn't the proudest moment for student Frannie Boyle. After consuming large quantities of alcohol before a party, her night would sometimes end in making out with a stranger or acquaintance.


Casual hook ups fueled by alcohol may be the norm across college campuses, but Boyle, now a 21-year-old junior at the school, chose to stop. Her reasons to quit hooking up echo the emotional devastation of many college students, particularly girls whose hearts are broken by the hook-up scene.


"I saw it [hooking up] as a way to be recognized and get satisfaction," said Boyle, shaking her blond ponytail. "I felt so empty then."


The hook-up culture on campuses may seem more pervasive than ever, especially as media outlets, books and documentaries rush to dissect the subject, but some college women and men are saying no.

Some, like Boyle, experimented with hooking up and quit. Though she is Catholic, she says her reason for disengaging herself from the hook-up culture had more to do with the unhappiness she experienced afterward. Others influenced by religion have abstained from casual physical activity from the moment they set foot on campus.


The idea of rejecting hook-ups may not be as strange as it sounds in a generation surrounded by sex. Pop star Lady Gaga recently announced she was celibate and encouraged others to follow. In Kelly Clarkson's song "I Don't Hook Up," she addresses the dominant hook-up culture: "I do not hook up, up I go slow, so if you want me I don't come cheap."



The term "hook up" is ambiguous, usually defined as a no-commitment, physical encounter with a stranger or acquaintance. Hooking up can range from just a make-out session all the way to sex. Other lingo for the no-commitment sexual encounters are "booty calls" or "friends with benefits."



Various academic studies have cited at least 75 percent of women have engaged in hooking up on campus, and the number is usually higher for men. The activity is most likely precipitated by alcohol, studies show. Boyle's decision to quit hooking up leaves her in the minority.


Evidence of the backlash on hooking up on campuses can be seen in the growing popularity of the Love and Fidelity Network, a secular, nonprofit group dedicated to helping college students open the discussion for a lifestyle that doesn't involve casual sexual activity with anonymous or uncommitted partners.


The organization, which promotes sexual integrity and defends marriage though discussion and speakers, has gained a presence on at least 20 schools from Harvard University to the University of Notre Dame since its inception in 2007. There is no official count on the number of students who participate in the Love and Fidelity Network. But at Princeton University, about 40 students have joined.

The group says it does not judge those who hook up, but it does promote abstinence.


"A majority of college campuses, when it comes to discussing marriage and sexual relationships, tend to be very one-sided," said Cassandra Hough, founding director of the Love and Fidelity Network. "We feel that it does add to pressures for young men and women to participate in a certain type of culture."


At Vanderbilt University, a pristine campus defined by elegant, Southern-style architecture and manicured lawns, the hook-up culture can be hard to avoid, Boyle said. The Greek scene also can create more pressure to hook up, added Boyle, who is a member of a sorority.


Boyle explained the warm weather compels some students to engage in "day fratting," imbibing for hours in the front yard of a fraternity. Day fratting can result in "afternoon delight," noncommittal physical activity between two people that can include casual sex.

"Right now, people conceive the idea of what they think from the media and friends -- that the only options are to extremes: to deny everything fun, including sex, or just to hook up," says Emily O'Connell, a freshman at the College of William and Mary in Virginia.


After observing the hook-up scene as a freshman, O'Connell is starting a nonreligious group to talk about alternatives to hooking up.


"There's definitely a middle ground, and it's not that outrageous," she said.


In addition to protection from STDs, some students may have good reasons not to hook up. Over the past decade, scholars, researchers and authors have begun to examine the psychological toll of hooking up.


An April 2010 study from James Madison University in Virginia revealed more college women tend to want a relationship out of a hook up compared with men who prefer to stay independent. Other studies have shown the instability from hooking up can cause depression. Repeated rejection and detached relationships can also damage self-esteem.


But Laura Sessions Stepp, author of "Unhooked: How Young Women Pursue Sex, Delay Love, and Lose at Both," said not all hook-ups have a negative impact. Some students can engage in no-strings relationships without suffering emotional trauma. Some women say casual sexual activity allows them the benefits of experimentation.

It's unclear at what point hooking up eclipsed traditional dates. But what is clear is that some students, like Boyle, want old-fashioned courtship to return.


Kathleen Bogle, who wrote "Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus" in 2008, says she's found there is a strong and growing desire to bring back traditional dating. Bogle points to the uptick in college students participating in online dating.


On Facebook.com, several groups are rooting for the traditional dates. The motto on the group Bring Dating Back reads, "This group is for all those girls who wish that once in a while a guy would take her out on a date before trying to get her into bed. At least invite us to dinner before expecting us to get down and dirty!"

Vanderbilt student Boyle says her decision she made at the end of her freshman year to quit hooking up came with criticism. She is still surrounded by friends and peers who do it.
She's already lost some guy friends who couldn't understand her decision. But Boyle counters, "They probably weren't my friends anyway."


Several students from her school participated in the Love and Fidelity Network's annual conference earlier this year. There is a possibility that Vanderbilt may start a similar nonreligious group that provides an alternative discussion to hooking up.

"I'm respecting myself," Boyle said confidently one sunny morning before class. "And I won't waste my time with some guy who doesn't care about me."

Photo from CNN

Followers