Pro Life in TN

My photo
Pro Life thoughts in a pro choice world through the eyes of a convert. I took early retirement after working in the social work and Human Resources fields but remain active by being involved in pro life education, lobbying and speaking .

Adoption

Adoption

Friday, January 7, 2011

Radical Doula: birth or abortion the outcome does not matter


Doula (ancient Greek for female slave)is a word that has most closely become associated with a woman who provides non-medical support during labor and birth, and also the postpartum period. Now this has been extended to the abortion arena. This article about Radical Doulas reminded me of a former well thought of OB GYN in middle TN who gave up her practice to perform abortions at one of the most notorious unlicensed abortion mills in Nashville. When some of her patients found out about it they were appalled and appealed to her not to do this. She told them that she could make more money working part time doing abortions than full time delivering babies and this would allow her to spend more time at home with her children!!    Some excerpts from this article reminded me of this woman who was able to compartmentalize her thinking. At one point, she briefly comments on examining the contents of the abortion in the clean up phase and I wonder of the difference in the procedures. One produces a child and other a butchered  child...it does not bother her....whatever the outcome.
"There are those who believe the two roles are contradictory. To those people I say: my goal during each is the same. I’m there to support the person giving birth/having an abortion/miscarriage. I’m not focused on the outcome, or the reason they are there. I’m focused on providing the best support possible. There is no contradiction there."
We currently work in one hospital and one clinic. I think the main difference between being an abortion doula and a birth doula is time...."
"That’s one of the things I like about abortion doula work–I can make time for it in my schedule, in my life, without having to be ready to drop everything for 24 hours for a long birth. It’s selfish, I know, but it’s been part of what’s allowed me to get back into it."

HT: Jill Stanek

Thursday, January 6, 2011

NYT: The Unborn Paradox Opinion Piece ....could the NYT actually be getting it??

Opinion piece in the New York Times of all places....excellent read  by Russ Douthat  talking about the paradox of abortion, surrogacy, adoption.
 Here is a teaser....

"This is the paradox of America’s unborn. No life is so desperately sought after, so hungrily desired, so carefully nurtured. And yet no life is so legally unprotected, and so frequently destroyed."

Could it be that even the NYT is getting it??

Update:TN couple is challenged on their pro life convictions

Update: 1-6-10

"God has certaiinly been wth us today. We have felt His presence through the friends and family that have surrounded us as well as in the prayers of our many brothers and sisters in Christ. Isaiah Samuel was born this afternoon, weighing in at 3 lbs, 11 oz. Although he was never able to draw in a breath, his heart b...eat for about an hour, and we were able to hold him close for that wonderful moment in time. His brief life has already touched many people, and we praise God for it!"

Update: Heather & Craig Plus 16 Legs  

Our c-section is scheduled for 12:30 today. As we leave for the hospital I wanted to say that we are overwhelmed by the love and support that has been shown to us. Great strength and peaces comes from knowing so many believers are lifting us up to the Most High. Today we celebrate life and the Author of Life!



Isaiah's Story


Above pix taken in 2009 after birth of 8th child. Please pray for Heather and Baby Isaiah. He will be born on Jan. 5th. 2011

by Heather & Craig Plus 16 Legs on Monday, January 3, 2011 at 1:17pm

    At my very first doctor's appointment, when our baby was only ten weeks old, the doctor alerted me that something was wrong.  She said there was an abnormality on the baby's head.  She was pretty sure it was something called an encephelocele, but she wanted me to come back in two weeks, when the baby was older, for more tests.  We prayed for two weeks and then returned.  The results confirmed that the baby did have an encephelocele, basically a sac that forms outside the skull due to an opening where the skull did not completely close when it was forming.  Brain matter and fluid move through the opening and create sort of a balloon effect outside the skull.  We were told that babies with these rarely make it to birth and if they do, they are severely disabled.  Our doctor said most people terminate the pregnancy because of the probable negative outcome.  We believe that only God has the right to number a person's days;  so we opted for pursuing all possible ways to help our baby if God chose for it to live.  We saw a team of specialists at Vanderbilt- obstetricians who deal with high risk pregnancies, a neurosurgeon who discussed the possibilities of removing the sac at birth, and pediatric specialists who would care for the baby at birth- if it lived that long.  Their findings were bleak.  They told us that our baby had a sac that was large- about the same size as the head itself.  This meant a greater mortality rate and more severe brain damage.  The neurosurgeon said, "I can do the surgery, but whatever is in that sac will have to be removed and the baby will likely be neurologically devastated."  They asked us if we still wanted to continue the pregnancy.  We answered yes again- we would take whatever God gave us.  This began a pattern of going to different doctors every week.  Five different doctors were working together monitoring the progress.  Ultrasounds every other week revealed more and more each time.  One of the first of these showed that the baby had clubbed feet.  Again the team sat down with us and explained that a physical marker such as this indicated severe brain damage.  Once again they asked if we wanted to continue.  More emphatically this time, we explained that we did not want to get in God's way.  We are not afraid of having a handicapped child and we believe all people have a purpose.  We would not terminate the pregnancy for any reason (we would be tested on this later).  

At this point, I think they began to take us more seriously.  They seemed encouraged that we wanted to continue- as if they had hoped this all along, but had to give us the straight facts and all the options anyway.  We asked our friends and family to pray, and nine days later, the next ultrasound left the technician speechless.  She looked at the feet of the baby and finally said, "I know this baby had clubbed feet last time, but I cannot find any evidence of this now.  His feet are perfect."  A miracle.  The next ultrasound, however, revealed more bad news.  They found that I had a complete placenta previa.  This is where the placenta is below the baby, and the mother is at risk of hemorrhaging as she carries the baby.  This new development would mean a change of lifestyle at the Bitterling house.  I would have to be on bed rest part of the time, and that rest would increase as time went on.  They told us one last time that we had the option to terminate the pregnancy.  Did we want to risk my life for a baby that probably wouldn't make it anyway?   Our resolve was being tested.  This was going to be difficult, but we were determined to leave it in God's hands. 
    Many doctor appointments later, we see that our baby is a healthy baby boy, except for the large sac.  The doctors admit that they do not know what is in the sac and how he will be affected at birth.  If there is only fluid, he may survive.  If there is brain stem, he will not be able to breathe on his own, and will likely die.  They say that one of the reasons they do not know what will happen is that most of these babies are aborted long before the baby develops enough to be born.  We don't know God's purpose in all of this, but we trust that He will bring good from it.  We have decided to name him Isaiah Samuel.  Isaiah means "the Lord Saves" and Samuel means "the Lord heard me."  We are asking God to hear our prayers and heal him physically, but if He chooses not to, we have peace that He will save him spiritually. 
    My placenta previa is still complete, and the doctors have continued to increase my bedrest.  With the help of family and friends, we are making it.  Spelling tests, tea parties, and heart to heart conversations on my bed have become the norm.  It has drawn our family ever closer to each other and to Christ.  It seems that God blesses us daily as we try to do His will and trust Him.  We all love this baby more every minute.  Craig and I are both talking to the other children on a daily basis about this.  We pray with them and discuss things with them one on one.  We try to know their hearts and make sure that we have answered any questions that they have.  I am amazed at their depth of understanding.  Our culture underestimates children.  They are capable of great sensitivity, love, and faith.  I guess that's why Jesus said we must become like them. 

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

New Stanek WND.com column, “MTV abortion special: Happy for the kill”

New Stanek WND.com column, “MTV abortion special: Happy for the kill”

NYT:Reversal of End of Life Counseling under Medicare....look who blinked


Well shine the light and the rats scurry. Article in NYT about the withdrawing of the regulation for end of life counseling in annual medicaid check up due to "procedural reasons" and tries to imply that the omission of it in the published advance for comment was  an oversight! Donald Berwick said in an email, let's keep from cheering too loudly so this does not get attention. Sorry Donald!
"While administration officials cited procedural reasons for changing the rule, it was clear that political concerns were also a factor. The renewed debate over advance care planning threatened to become a distraction to administration officials who were gearing up to defend the health law against attack by the new Republican majority in the House."

"Although the health care bill signed into law in March did not mention end-of-life planning, the topic was included in a huge Medicare regulation setting payment rates for thousands of physician services. The final regulation was published in the Federal Register in late November. The proposed rule, published for public comment in July, did not include advance care planning."

" The provision for advance care planning was not included in the final health care overhaul signed into law by President Obama. Health policy experts assumed that the proposal had been set aside — until a similar idea showed up in the final Medicare regulation in November."

Coming Home: NY State aborts 3X as many citizens as it gains....

 Coming Home posts this and even the headline is shocking...

 Census 2010: New York State Aborts Three Times as Many Citizens as it Gains


The 2010 Census data have been released on State growth between 2000-2010. The data report Population Change, Population Density, and Apportionment of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The Census reports that New York State grew by an extremely modest 2.1% over the past ten years, from 18,976,457 to 19,378,102, a gain of only 401,645 citizens.
A review of New York State’s Vital Statistics from 2000-2009 shows that we have aborted 1,206,652** babies statewide. That number is three times greater than the number of citizens by which the state population grew.
{** The 2009 data are not yet available, so the lowest annual number of abortions, that of 2005, was used to give the most conservative number.}
See the NY State data here in data tables showing totals by race/ethnicity
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009**Not Yet available. 2005 data used as lowest, most conservative number in this 10-year period.
These numbers do not indicate that the abortion rate is three times the birth rate. What they do indicate is that our net gain of citizens after all is said and done (birth, death, migration) is 1/4 of what it would have been had we not slaughtered 1,206,652 of our citizens in their mother’s wombs. It should be noted that 909,938 of these slaughtered innocents lost their lives in New York City.
During the past ten years in New York City, over 725,000 (79%) of these tiny victims were black and Hispanic.
To get a sense of perspective, since 9/11 New York City has killed through abortion approximately 330 times the 2,752 citizens who died in the Towers that day.
So what does this do to New York State regarding apportionment?
We have lost two seats in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. We are tied with Ohio in the most losses of seats in the House. We’ve lost much needed workers who will not be there to support the Baby Boom generation on their social security and medicare/medicaid.
The numbers don’t lie. Our net gain of citizens is 1/4 of what it would have been without this barbarity that grips my city and state by the throat, choking its life and love, its humanity and compassion.
It is an orgy of death, some 330 babies killed every day in the Empire State.
It is our great shame.
It must end.
We’re dying.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

TN couple is challenged on their pro life convictions

Update: Heather & Craig Plus 16 Legs  

Our c-section is scheduled for 12:30 today. As we leave for the hospital I wanted to say that we are overwhelmed by the love and support that has been shown to us. Great strength and peaces comes from knowing so many believers are lifting us up to the Most High. Today we celebrate life and the Author of Life!



Isaiah's Story


Above pix taken in 2009 after birth of 8th child. Please pray for Heather and Baby Isaiah. He will be born on Jan. 5th. 2011

by Heather & Craig Plus 16 Legs on Monday, January 3, 2011 at 1:17pm

    At my very first doctor's appointment, when our baby was only ten weeks old, the doctor alerted me that something was wrong.  She said there was an abnormality on the baby's head.  She was pretty sure it was something called an encephelocele, but she wanted me to come back in two weeks, when the baby was older, for more tests.  We prayed for two weeks and then returned.  The results confirmed that the baby did have an encephelocele, basically a sac that forms outside the skull due to an opening where the skull did not completely close when it was forming.  Brain matter and fluid move through the opening and create sort of a balloon effect outside the skull.  We were told that babies with these rarely make it to birth and if they do, they are severely disabled.  Our doctor said most people terminate the pregnancy because of the probable negative outcome.  We believe that only God has the right to number a person's days;  so we opted for pursuing all possible ways to help our baby if God chose for it to live.  We saw a team of specialists at Vanderbilt- obstetricians who deal with high risk pregnancies, a neurosurgeon who discussed the possibilities of removing the sac at birth, and pediatric specialists who would care for the baby at birth- if it lived that long.  Their findings were bleak.  They told us that our baby had a sac that was large- about the same size as the head itself.  This meant a greater mortality rate and more severe brain damage.  The neurosurgeon said, "I can do the surgery, but whatever is in that sac will have to be removed and the baby will likely be neurologically devastated."  They asked us if we still wanted to continue the pregnancy.  We answered yes again- we would take whatever God gave us.  This began a pattern of going to different doctors every week.  Five different doctors were working together monitoring the progress.  Ultrasounds every other week revealed more and more each time.  One of the first of these showed that the baby had clubbed feet.  Again the team sat down with us and explained that a physical marker such as this indicated severe brain damage.  Once again they asked if we wanted to continue.  More emphatically this time, we explained that we did not want to get in God's way.  We are not afraid of having a handicapped child and we believe all people have a purpose.  We would not terminate the pregnancy for any reason (we would be tested on this later).  

At this point, I think they began to take us more seriously.  They seemed encouraged that we wanted to continue- as if they had hoped this all along, but had to give us the straight facts and all the options anyway.  We asked our friends and family to pray, and nine days later, the next ultrasound left the technician speechless.  She looked at the feet of the baby and finally said, "I know this baby had clubbed feet last time, but I cannot find any evidence of this now.  His feet are perfect."  A miracle.  The next ultrasound, however, revealed more bad news.  They found that I had a complete placenta previa.  This is where the placenta is below the baby, and the mother is at risk of hemorrhaging as she carries the baby.  This new development would mean a change of lifestyle at the Bitterling house.  I would have to be on bed rest part of the time, and that rest would increase as time went on.  They told us one last time that we had the option to terminate the pregnancy.  Did we want to risk my life for a baby that probably wouldn't make it anyway?   Our resolve was being tested.  This was going to be difficult, but we were determined to leave it in God's hands. 
    Many doctor appointments later, we see that our baby is a healthy baby boy, except for the large sac.  The doctors admit that they do not know what is in the sac and how he will be affected at birth.  If there is only fluid, he may survive.  If there is brain stem, he will not be able to breathe on his own, and will likely die.  They say that one of the reasons they do not know what will happen is that most of these babies are aborted long before the baby develops enough to be born.  We don't know God's purpose in all of this, but we trust that He will bring good from it.  We have decided to name him Isaiah Samuel.  Isaiah means "the Lord Saves" and Samuel means "the Lord heard me."  We are asking God to hear our prayers and heal him physically, but if He chooses not to, we have peace that He will save him spiritually. 
    My placenta previa is still complete, and the doctors have continued to increase my bedrest.  With the help of family and friends, we are making it.  Spelling tests, tea parties, and heart to heart conversations on my bed have become the norm.  It has drawn our family ever closer to each other and to Christ.  It seems that God blesses us daily as we try to do His will and trust Him.  We all love this baby more every minute.  Craig and I are both talking to the other children on a daily basis about this.  We pray with them and discuss things with them one on one.  We try to know their hearts and make sure that we have answered any questions that they have.  I am amazed at their depth of understanding.  Our culture underestimates children.  They are capable of great sensitivity, love, and faith.  I guess that's why Jesus said we must become like them. 
    The doctors have decided to deliver the baby by c-section on Wednesday, January 5th.  The c-section is necessary, both because of the baby's encephelocele and because of my placenta previa.  Isaiah will only be 34 weeks on January 5th, but they have decided that this is sort of the middle of a teeter totter.  It is the point when the least amount of risk to either life occurs.  Waiting longer threatens my life, and being born any earlier threatens Isaiah's survival.  Even at this point, there are risks.  We joke that we don't need one miracle, but a whole string of them.  So - we are humbly asking our friends and family to pray for health, wisdom, and peace for our family.  And, may God's glory continue to be revealed through the life of Isaiah.

Heather

"For you created my inmost being, you knit me together in my mother's womb.  I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well."   Psalm 139:13-14

Tennessean: headline incomplete due to space,ignorance or to advance liberal agenda ??

Article in Tennessean yesterday had a catchy headline.That is what it if for. To attract your attention and get you to read the article. Too bad the headline is not always accurate. I know space is limited but sometimes key words are left out on purpose due to agendas or ignorance. Many reporters do not have a good knowledge of the subject matter; but often there is an agenda. The Tennessean is a liberal paper and it is easy to see their agenda. This article was on stem cells. Many, unfortunately, skim over the words and do not understand the difference between adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells.

The article tells about two ladies in this area suffering from degenerative diseases, MS and spinal cord injury. They travel abroad for ADULT stem cell treatments. Neither one brought the success they had hoped for but it allowed them, in one case, some relief and in the other case closure. I wish the reporter would have clarified the difference between adult and embryonic stem cells. They tend to lump them together in an attempt to confuse and persuade the public. There is promise in adult stem cells, the kind that come from umbilical cords or your own cells or other cells that do not require killing in order to use. There should be more money invested in this research. Embryonic stem cells are derived from killing the embryo which is LIFE in an early form. We were all embryos at one time.

  I wish the reporter had realized that there never has been a ban on embryonic stem cell research but a ban on using tax money to fund this. What researchers really want is an open wallet of tax money to do their research. Think it is not important that the embryo is killed to do this?? Because it is so small and does not yet  look like a baby or going to die anyway? Then do not criticize the Nazis for their experiments on the Jews in the prison camps who were the subject of experimentation to further their science. They were destined to die in the gas chambers eventually so why not use them for experimentation?

We are no better. No one has to teach us how to be selfish....it comes naturally to us. But look into the face of snowflake baby and ask if that life should be ended to  help another born life.  Why not invest in adult stem cell research which has shown such promise without the ethical dilemna! Agendas and incomplete reporting......yuk.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Palin and death panels...First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”


This is what came to mind when I read this column by Cal Thomas stating that Sarah Palin is owed an apology by the MSM who mocked her....and now are stating to break the news of the death panel that they laughed at.






Sunday, January 2, 2011

What women want....do they even realize it?

Article not specifically on the life issue but on my mind and a good read...
"And what is it that women most admire in a man? From decades of talking to women on the radio and, of course, from simply living life, I have concluded that an admirable man is one who has three qualities: strength, integrity, ambition. All three are needed. Strength without integrity is machismo. Integrity without strength or without ambition makes a man a milquetoast. And ambition without integrity makes for a successful crook."
HT:  Pro Life Pro Woman

Top Ten Posts....

  Top Ten Posts from 2010 from Pro Life in  TN




































































































Live Science study: more comfortable letting people into their bodies than they are with them watching their cat,"


Live Science has an interesting study that says delaying sex makes for a better relationship. This  gets you back to age old wisdom from your parents and the Good Book  which leads to less unplanned pregnancies and abortions. 


"...couples who wait to be sexual have time to figure out how trustworthy their partner is, how well they communicate, and whether they share the same values in life "before the powerful sexual bonding short-circuits their decision-making abilities."
"A humorous  and sad note is that " ... 40 percent of couples are essentially sexual within the first or second time they go out, but we suspect that if you asked these same couples at this early stage of their relationship – 'Do you trust this person to watch your pet for a weekend many could not answer this in the affirmative' – meaning they are more comfortable letting people into their bodies than they are with them watching their cat,"

HT: First Things

Followers