(Prolifer)ations 6-19-10
June 29, 2010
by
Susie Allen, host of the blog,
Pro-Life
in TN
Jennifer Derwey at ProWomanProLife discusses the recent study from the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists regarding fetal pain before 24
weeks. Pro-lifers dispute that pro-aborts authored the study for their
own agenda. Nevertheless, as Jennifer states:
The situation illuminates the problem with gestational time-lines as a basis for abortion law. When did pain become the
determining factor for whether or not a person or animal is deserving of
life... ? After all, there are adults who don't feel pain. May we kill them?
Gerard Nadal at Coming Home compares the civil
war over abortion to the past struggle for abolition of slavery and the
wisdom gained:
In the decades to come, our posterity too will look back
and join in [John] Adams' words:
"We understand now, we've been made to understand, and to embrace
the understanding... that who we are IS who we were."
John Jakubczyk delivers his
criticism of Kathleen Parker's latest article on feminism, in which she
supports life but opposes the reversal of Roe v. Wade,
one of the most poorly reasoned legal opinions of all time.
40
Days for Life celebrates the ceasing of abortions at
the Triangle Abortion Clinic in Raleigh,
NC.
Wesley Smith juxtaposes health
rationing in the UK due to the nursing shortage against
worries about age discrimination lawsuits from women wanting IVF
treatments after age 40:
So, some seriously ill patients might get rationed out of a
stay in hospital, or receive less than optimal care due to a nursing
shortage, as money will be diverted to older women so they can
give birth past their time? I'm sorry, but that is just plain nuts.
No comments:
Post a Comment