Kendall McKenzie used to make her living from PP, the nation's largest abortion provider, but is now a writer and activist who pens a column to complain about an informed consent law recently passed in MO. She starts off disputing scientific evidence that life begins at conception. For this she links back to a column written by Frances Kissling who is not a scientist but heads a pro abortion group where she babbles on and on about theologians over the years discussing when the fetus becomes a person. This is scientific evidence about when life begins?? The scientific evidence is clear but when pro aborts want to change the subject and say when does this life become a person.
Anyway, pro abort McKenzie talks about why should a mother be forced to risk her life to carry this foreign invader as if all pregnancies end in death of the mother. Another outlandish statement! And this baby is not a foreigner but in the most natural place as someone who the mother helped create.
But what caught my eye is that if abortion is only removing an unwelcome object and not the ending of a human life, why all the descriptive terms to make the woman out to be the victim. Do I grieve getting a tooth pulled or my hair cut. But look at the sad terms she uses to discuss removing something that is not life from her body.
"... abortions are an unpleasant but necessary medical procedure..."
"Language like what's in the 2010 Abortion Restriction Law is particularly insulting because it insinuates that women make the intensely personal and sometimes difficult and morally fraught decision to terminate a pregnancy with little thought or consideration, and as a result basically forces doctors to become your misogynist anti-choice dad for a few minutes"
Hmmm speaking of misogyny, what about the female babies being destroyed! Morally fraught decision, difficult decision??? Their own words betray them.
4 comments:
Lady, life does not begin at conception. The scientific definition of life is "the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally." That means you're a murderer if you eat a carrot or pick a flower, by your logic. Show me a scientist who defines "life" exclusively in terms of fetuses, and I'll show someone who deserves to have their credentials revoked.
Love,
A pro-abortion patriot
Dr. Micheline M. Mathews-Roth, Harvard medical School, gave confirming testimony, supported by references from over 20 embryology and other medical textbooks that human life began at conception.
"Father of Modern Genetics" Dr. Jerome Lejeune told the lawmakers: "To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion ... it is plain experimental evidence."
Dr. Hymie Gordon, Chairman, Department of Genetics at the Mayo Clinic, added: "By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception."
Dr. McCarthy de Mere, medical doctor and law professor, University of Tennessee, testified: "The exact moment of the beginning of personhood and of the human body is at the moment of conception."
Dr. Alfred Bongiovanni, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, concluded, "I am no more prepared to say that these early stages represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty ... is not a human being."
Dr. Richard V. Jaynes: "To say that the beginning of human life cannot be determined scientifically is utterly ridiculous."
Dr. Landrum Shettles, sometimes called the "Father of In Vitro Fertilization" notes, "Conception confers life and makes that life one of a kind." And on the Supreme Court ruling _Roe v. Wade_, "To deny a truth [about when life begins] should not be made a basis for legalizing abortion."
Professor Eugene Diamond: "...either the justices were fed a backwoods biology or they were pretending ignorance about a scientific certainty."
I wonder how many babies died while you were writing this article? Seems to me that your pro-life resources could be better spent.
So, since about 50% of fertilized eggs naturally fail to implant, would you like me to send you all my used tampons so you hold monthly miscarried baby funerals? I mean, I've just been flushing them, but that seems rather callous considering they might potentially be absorbing precious lives. In fact, I'm having my period right now, and I feel really guilty about the babies my murderous uterus is probably expelling. We should round up all the uteruses and put them in jail like the murderers they are. Uteruses are the real baby killers!
Post a Comment