Pro Life in TN

My photo
Pro Life thoughts in a pro choice world through the eyes of a convert. I took early retirement after working in the social work and Human Resources fields but remain active by being involved in pro life education, lobbying and speaking .

Adoption

Adoption
Showing posts with label euthanasia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label euthanasia. Show all posts

Saturday, February 11, 2012

10 yrs of legalized killing...let's celebrate....

Big Blue Wave spotted this.....film festival promoting a decade of euthanasia. Wow, the Dutch have a weird sense of humor. I saw two of the films they highlighted. Something to celebrate and be proud of.....well you be the judge. How easy is it to cross from voluntary euthanasia to involuntary...pretty easy.

"Oddly enough, the program does not include one of the first and most famous euthanasia films, the tear-jerker Ich Klage An – perhaps because it was made by Nazis during World War II to promote voluntary euthanasia as a cover-up for the involuntary sort."

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Introduce the elderly to the jungle.....

You won't know what hit you....
 Well I have been to the jungle. In fact  I have been there seven times. Yes, the law of the jungle is for the jungle and it works. But we are humans. With human souls. We are not ants, plants or animals.  Why is this article getting any attention or play at all.  And get that this is written by a religious lefty, April L. Bogle who actually is the Director of Public Relations, Emory University's Center for the Study of Law and Religion.No kidding.... She has thoughts about what you should do with the elderly who live past their usefulness and of course she brings in the economic issues. She hates nursing homes and who loves them. Yes, many are bad but I have also worked in nursing homes and you can put me there as opposed to letting me get eaten after my neck is broken...


"Monkeys befriend toucans and then break their necks before eating them. Frogs eat mosquito larvae and other pesky bugs. Termites eat rotting trees and build large nests that birds invade for dinner. Even the trees know how to survive -- the walking palm sprouts new roots and kills old ones so that it can "walk" to find the nourishing sun under the thick tree canopy.
And the smells? Earthy fresh, clean, sometimes floral, occasionally appetizing (flowers that smell like garlic). And the sounds? A symphony of the original tweets and twitters, clicks and clacks, even howls and squeals. Some are songs of joy, some are sirens of warning, some are simply announcements of being alive."
 She of course does not really suggest we eat the elderly......just a metaphor.
"I know its fraught will all kinds of moral and legal dilemmas. But if we can prolong life beyond its natural time line, we can surely figure out how to allow people to end it -- on their own terms and with the dignity they deserve. "
Count her another advocate for euthanasia and assisted suicide....the slippery slope.....are we at the bottom yet?

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Whose life is it anyway....assisted suicide, euthanasia or natural death??

I like to watch old movies...last  night I found one from 1981...seems like yesterday entitled
"Whose Life is it Anyway?" I remember watching it and I thought it would be good  to watch it again to see how I felt about it since I am now pro life and write about assisted suicide and euthanasia. I have a different viewpoint  now.


Here is the plot line.... talented sculptor has a terrible car accident that leaves him paralyzed from the neck down.  He spends 6 mos. in a hospital and has daily dialysis. He is married but has no other relatives.  He  tells his wife not to come and see him and go with her life and she agrees referring to him as  the late Ken.
When he realizes that this will be his life going forward with no hope of ever using his arms, hands and legs...he sues to be allowed to die. The judge sides with him. The main doctor vehemently opposes his application to die. He says that the man is clinically depressed and will eventually come to accept his situation and make a new life for himself in a rehab capacity.  So when the character played by Richard Dreyfus  wins his lawsuit, the Dr. asks him what he intends to do now that he is free to leave the care of the hospital...Dreyfus says he will go get a room someplace and just wait until death overtakes him. The Dr. offers for him to stay at the hospital so his pain can be controlled. The Dr. says  he will be taken off daily dialysis and can refuse food and drink if he wants to. "You will be in a coma in a few days and dead within a week", says the Dr. "You aren't thinking of trying any resuscitation on me are  you?" asks Dreyfus. "Not unless you ask for it" answered the Dr.  Dreyfus asks why would you agree to this since you fought so hard not to allow this? "

"Because you might change your mind." said the Dr. 

That is how the movie ended. You never saw him die. You were left to wonder if he changed his mind. He had a sharp mind and made many friends in the hospital.  Now the movie was slanted to get you to agree with the right to die of the paralyzed man who did not want to live that way.  Everyone can sympathize. But since watching that the first time I have had the opportunity to meet people in that situation who went on to have a life with quality...yes, a different kind of quality. But as I watched  the movie the second time....it caused me to ask. Is this the same thing as euthanasia or assisted suicide? No one made an assertive action to end his life. He made the decision to discontinue dialysis  and we don't know if he decided to forgo hydration and nourishment. Isn't that more like someone with a terminal illness who makes the decision to discontinue treatments?


What do you think?





Friday, March 18, 2011

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition: 4 US Victories and 1 to go against assisted suicide


 Cross Posted at:
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Assisted Suicide politics in the United States - Four Victories - One to go.

Following the November 2010 elections, the suicide lobby announced that they will legalize assisted suicide in at least one eastern US state and that their push will lead to several states legalizing assisted suicide within the next few years.

It appears that the goals of the suicide lobby are failing.

In Hawaii, Senator Ige sponsored bill SB 803 to legalize assisted suicide that was introduced on January 21. SB 803 was sent to the Senate Health Committee where on February 7, it received more than 4 hours of debate. 

Senate Health committee chairman Josh Green had stated in an interview that he would be supporting the assisted suicide bill. When the vote on SB 803 was called, it was defeated by 4 to 0 in committee 

Green stated that he was swayed by the testimony. The testimony from the disability community was particularly effective. Recent bills to legalize assisted suicide in Hawaii in 2005 and 2007 were also defeated.

In Montana, a December 31, 2009 court decision, did not legalize assisted suicide or create a right to assisted suicide, as the suicide lobby claims, but the court did create a defense of consent for doctors who are prosecuted for assisted suicide.

Montana faced two bills concerning assisted suicide. On February 10, Senator Anders Blewitt sponsored Bill SB 167. To his surprise SB 167 was defeated by a vote of 7 to 5 in the Montana Senate Judiciary Committee. 

Several days later Senator Greg Hinkle's Bill SB 116, that would have protected Montana citizens from assisted suicide, was also defeated by 7 to 5 vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee. That means that after a huge campaign by the suicide lobby, assisted suicide remains illegal in Montana.

Last year the suicide lobby organized a significant push to gain public support for assisted suicide in Idaho. In response to the push by the suicide lobby, on February 4, Senator Russ Fulcher introduced Senate Bill SB 1070 to clean-up the criminal code to ensure that assisted suicide is completely illegal in Idaho.

On March 11, the Idaho Senate passed HB 1070 by a vote of 31 to 2.

On February 2, New Hampshire bill HB 513,that was sponsored by Rep Charles Weed, to legalize assisted suicide was introduced. Those who follow the issue know that a similar bill to legalize assisted suicide was defeated in the New Hampshire legislature, in January 2010, by a vote of 242 to 113.

On February 28, bill HB 513 was debated in the New Hampshire House Judiciary Committee. On March 15, HB 513 was defeated by a vote of 234 to 99 in the New Hampshire House. 

This is a substantial victory. HB 513 is essentially an "Oregon Style" bill. This proves that when lawmakers have the opportunity to debate Oregon Style assisted suicide, the majority will reject it as unsafe.

Following the November election, Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin promised that his government would legalize assisted suicide in their state. Shumlin, who had unsuccessfully sponsored assisted suicide bills in the past, received significant support from the suicide lobby during his campaign for Governor.

Bill H 274 was introduced on February 17 after more than a month of delays. Once again, H 274 is an "Oregon Style" assisted suicide bill. A similar bill, that was sponsored by Shumlin, was defeated by a vote of 82 to 63 in March 2007.

The Vermont legislators need to examine H 274 and defeat it because it is a Recipe for Elder Abuse and only creates an illusion of choice.

We look forward to the defeat of Vermont bill H 274.

Monday, January 31, 2011

Film that romanticizes euthanasia wins award ...

Workplace Benefits  has a post about OR euthanasia law that romanticizes the  practice in  the documentary that won an award from the Sundance Festival. 



"Richardson also interviews uninsured prostate cancer patient Randy Stroup, who was denied further health care by Oregon’s insurance program after an initial operation was unsuccessful. In a notorious case that gained nationwide attention, the state offered him the Death With Dignity option instead of further surgery. Although the agency ultimately reversed its ruling and approved chemotherapy, Stroup succumbed, bringing further attention to the inadequacies of healthcare coverage for the uninsured."


“How to Die in Oregon” may well turn out to be a definitive social issue documentary in the expanding right to die movement and the national healthcare debate. Despite the policy implications, however, the most affecting aspects of the film are the subjects’ courage and openness discussing extremely private matters and the filmmakers’ compassionate approach."

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

The connection between organ transplation and euthanasia


I follow the work of  Alex Shadenberg who fights against euthanasia. This is an article that points out another danger of euthanasia and that is coercion of the practice to harvest healthy organs for  transplantation. Currently in the US if someone dies of cancer, their organs are not used even if they signed the consent form. But of course is someone is otherwise healthy and they either consent or are euthanized  ( a nice long word for killed) their organs are considered "high quality."
"How much pressure to convince people to die by euthanasia will be on people. First there is pressure based on the cost of medical care. Then there is pressure from family members who are tired of caring for the person. Then there is pressure on a person because society has made them feel like a burden. Now there is pressure because good will come from euthanasia if they donate their healthy organs.

The reason the organs are healthy is that the person is often not yet dying, but of course euthanasia takes care of that problem."
But of course they separate the euthanasia and transplantation to "wash their hands" of the subtle evil.
Euthanasia for organ transplant is a bit different from normal euthanasia, the doctors say, because they prefer that patients die in hospital rather than at home.

They have developed a protocol for the procedure. 
- There has to be a strict separation between the euthanasia request, the euthanasia procedure, and the organ procurement. 
- The donor and his (or her) relatives have to consent. 
- The euthanasia is performed by a neurologist or psychiatrist and two house physicians. 
- Organ retrieval begins after clinical diagnosis of death by the three physicians. 
- And, of course, staff participation is voluntary.
 It sounds very similar to the Groningen Protocol, the Protocol that allows Dutch physicians to euthanize newborns with disabilities.

Mumbai:Young nurse attacked in 1973 now journalist petitions for death by stravation for her


What a story out of India where euthanasia is still illegal! A young nurse is attacked, raped and strangled in 1973 and is considered brain dead since then.  Amazingly her attacker was sentenced to only 7 years in  prison.She is in a persistent vegetative state  PVS  per the article. At one point they say that she is being force fed by nurses twice a day. But further in the article, it states that she accepts food voluntarily and makes facial expressions and responds to commands by making sounds. This does not sound like force feeding to me or a persistent vegetative state. No mention of family but the person making the official plea to end her life by stopping her food is a journalist by the name of Pinki Virani who wrote a book about her.

"India's Supreme Court has directed three doctors to examine the medical condition of a woman who has been in a vegetative state since 1973."
They expect a decision next month.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

ALL: Repacking death as life...a must read


American Life League " REPACKAGING DEATH AS LIFE—THE THIRD PATH TO IMPOSED DEATH" is a must read as it discusses a pro life issue that may not get adequate attention....euthanasia. From Daniel Callahan, a major “third path” proponent..."“Denial of nutrition, may, in the long run, become the only effective way to make certain that a large number of biologically tenacious patients actually die.”

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Brtish TV : Guest advocates smothering ill child and abortion as acts of love

 From Bryan Kemper.com

"If you thought Eugenics were a thing of the past, something that died off with Hitler; you are sadly mistaken.

Watch these videos from a British TV Show; author and columnist, Virginia Ironside share her eugenic views.  While the female clergy surely looks surprised and shocked in this first video, I think I would have exploded at these statements if I had been on the show. In this first video she refers to children as simply a couple of cells and talks about how loving mothers would suffocate sick children with a pillow."




Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Going Dutch has a new meaning and it has nothing to do with picking up the dinner tab...

 Talk about a bucket list...once you feel you have completed your life or list...auto-euthanasia clinics await you.

Expanding euthanasia to those who might not qualify under government regulations in the Netherlands...
According to Radio Netherlands, Right to Die NL (NVVE) wants to set up “life’s end” clinics to accommodate  people who do not meet the government’s legal requirements for euthanasia. These people include those suffering from chronic psychiatric problems, Alzheimer’s or dementia, or who feel they have “completed” their life. 

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Sign of the Times....or like yelling "jump" to someone perched on a bridge??



A  billboard in San Fransico is attracting attention alright. Here is an article   in the Bay Citizen on the feelings from this recent addition to the scenery. Here are some excerpts.

This is irresponsible and downright dangerous; it is the equivalent of handing a gun to someone who is suicidal,” wrote Lanny Berman, president of the International Association of Suicide Prevention, in an email.
 Forty-five years ago, San Francisco had the highest suicide rate in the world. In 1962, the city developed the first crisis hotline in the United States, a model now replicated around the country. Since then, the annual suicide rate in San Francisco has dropped by half.
Final Exit Network paid for the billboard and said it hoped it would provoke discussion about “the right to die.”
Members of Final Exit Network, which was founded in 2005, have been present at the deaths of about 130 people.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Being conditioned to accept infanticide and euthanasia??

The in box is full on the topic of infanticide....as it seems that Media Matters  is using quotes from Dr. Peter Singer in their defense of Donald Berwick who is nominated by POTUS to be the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Attention is now on this due to  a piece written   by Ben Domenech  of Big Government 
".....given his particularly radical agenda when it comes to health policy — an agenda that includes support for massive government rationing and his support of using health care bureaucracy to redistribute wealth."
In defending such outspoken comments, they use Singer quotes to defend him! Amazing! Singer is most known in the pro life world as a believer in infanticide and non voluntary euthanasia and is most unapologetic about it. Here is one of the quotes from a 1996 book.

"Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons. Hence their lives would seem to be no more worthy of protection than the life of a fetus."

Even pro choice advocates should shudder....he sees infanticide as an acceptable method of dealing with a child with disabilities.   To Singer there is nothing even sacred about birth!  Anytime you start hearing the words...scarce medical resources...you are being conditioned to accept infanticide and euthanasia and even involuntary euthanasia. So not to go off on Singer, who amazingly enough , is considered pretty mainstream,  this defense of Berwick includes quotes from such an individual. This should be a red flag but in an administration headed by a man who supported  infanticide as a state senator in coldly defending the  leaving babies who survive abortions to die, what should we expect?  And they laughed when Sarah Palin called them death panels. She may turn out to be a prophet.
Read Domenech full article here on this issue. If you are not alarmed, then the conditioning may be working on you to be ready for rationing.

photo from nailseacount.com
 

Thursday, April 22, 2010

The Death-trap of Euthanasia.....an amazing story

 As I read this article I am astonished and it brings tears to my eyes. The first question I thought 
was , how did they maintain his nourishment?? Was he on feeding tubes? I researched further and found that he was spoon fed by his devoted wife and moved frequently to prevent bed sores. Amazing....but the part that was so personal to me is that while in a coma for 19 years he could hear everything going on around him including the doctors saying he would not survive.....this is personal to me. 

Ten years ago my husband was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor. Long story short is that he was put into an induced coma while they tried to fight pneumonia etc....but the point is that while in the coma on the last day of his life, the doctor stood over his bed and gave me a very bad report of his status. When I realized what he was saying I asked if we should not step outside to continue the conversation......but he nodded toward my comatose husband and said he can't hear us . I asked him to give me one positive piece of information to hang on to and he looked at the machines plugged into my husband and said well for now he is still alive...my husband died at 7 that evening. No one pulled any plugs and discontinued anything, he just slipped quietly away.....but as I feel strongly and experts since then have confirmed that hearing is the last to go. I believe my husband heard the bad report and lost his fighting spirit and let go.  
Susie


From:
speroforum.com

Wednesday, April 21, 2010
By Clemente Ferrer

Nineteen years in a coma,  the case of Jan Grzebski, a 65 year-old Polish man, was reported by various media around the world. He became known for the extraordinary fact that he woke up from a long physical absence, rather than a spiritual one.
A rail worker, in 1988 he suffered a serious labor related accident and fell into a deep coma. However, he regained his consciousness back completely in 2007. He affirms that, during those years of apparent unconsciousness, he was aware of all that was happening around him, even though he couldn’t move nor speak.
His wife Gertruda never abandoned him. Her profound faith in God made her hope for a miracle: that her husband, and father of her children, would come back to life. She never lost hope in God. She strongly opposed the euthanasia that was suggested so that Jan would not to suffer. She didn’t accept it because she had faith and believed that her husband would recover.

What great confusion for those scholars blinded by their arrogance, who believe themselves to be in possession of the truth about good and evil and the destinies of human beings. Jan affirmed that he owes his life to his wife, for whom he professed a profound gratitude for the rest of his life. 

While apparently unconscious, Jan could hear his doctors’ conversations and their arrogant predictions that he would not survive. The only thing he wanted to do was live. He ardently wished to simply exist while his doctors planned for his elimination. He heard everything the doctors said: Jan was alive and conscious of all that was happening around him.

It is not licit to kill a human being just for the sake of preventing suffering, nor to avoid seeing suffering. No one can authorize the death of a transcendental being, even an incurable and agonizingly ill person, or on in a deep state of coma. Medical experts can remedy these hurtful situations.

The incitement to euthanasia – a trap leading to death – putting an end to one’s own existence is truly perverse. We are on a collision course towards the culture of death so prevalent in opulent societies.
The wise words of Pope John Paul II come to mind: “I confirm that euthanasia is a grave violation of God’s Law, for it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable elimination of a human being.”
Clemente Ferrer is a media consultant in Spain. See his website here.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Jacob Appeal: Medical Historian, Spin Doctor or Questionable Ethicist???

Not Dead Yet highlights Jacob Appel's mini-rant in the Huffington Post and his recently published essay which supports allowing parents of seriously ill or disabled children to request that their children be killed. Even more alarming is his advocacy that fear of potential suffering rather than parental consent should be the determining factor.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Lia's back with a speech on euthanasia...kill the pain not the patient

It is oratory contest time in TN. I am looking forward to this event. Here is one young lady that knows her stuff.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Police investigate BBC broadcaster's claims that he killed his partner

I once heard someone from Hospice discuss this issue...basically he said that they have the ability to keep someone pain free until natural death so the claims that assisted suicide is necessary is bogus...as a Christian we accept that God decides when death comes and we are not to interfere. This is another example of someone who knows better than God but judging from his comments he is not a believer. 

 


 

Ray Gosling says he is not worried about answering charges over killing lover who had Aids as he did it 'from his heart'
Photograph: David Sillitoe

Ray Gosling, a BBC broadcaster, told Inside Out that he had smothered his lover in hospital
Police are to investigate claims made by a BBC broadcaster that he killed a former partner who was terminally ill.
Ray Gosling told the East Midlands' Inside Out programme, broadcast last night, that he had agreed to smother his lover, who was living with Aids, if his suffering became too intense.
Gosling said that his partner had been in hospital in "terrible pain" when a doctor told him there was nothing more that could be done.
He said that he asked the doctor to leave them alone and then, "I picked up the pillow and smothered him until he was dead".

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Patients in 'vegetative' state can think and communicate


Patients left in a “vegetative” state after suffering devastating brain damage are able to understand and communicate, groundbreaking research suggests.

'Vegetative state' brain scan images:: the fMRI images which were used as part of the study by Dr Adrian Owen 
'Vegetative state' brain scan images:: the fMRI images which were used as part of the study by Dr Adrian Owen.
Experts using brain scans have discovered for the first time that the victims, who show no outward signs of awareness, can not only comprehend what people are saying to them but also answer simple questions.
They were able to give yes or no responses to simple biographical questions.

The unlocking of this “inner voice” has astounded doctors and has dramatic implications for thousands of life and death decisions over patients trapped in what is known as a persistent vegetative state (PVS).
It means around one in five PVS patients may be able to communicate.
It will raise questions about when doctors should switch off life support machines. It is likely to add to the debate on assisted suicide as the patient could potentially decide and communicate if they wish to carry on living. It comes just weeks after Kay Gilderdale was acquitted of assisting the suicide of her daughter Lynn who the jury accepted had lived a “twilight life” for more than 17 years.
Up to a thousand PVS patients in Britain are kept alive by doctors in the hope they may one day regain consciousness.
But in some cases, like Hillsborough victim Tony Bland, relatives have won the right to withdraw treatment to allow them to die.
Dr Adrian Owen, co-author at the Brain Sciences Unit in Cambridge who carried out the latest research on one patient, said the findings have enormous philosophical and ethical implications.
He said: “We were astonished when we saw the results of the patient’s scan and that he was able to correctly answer the questions that were asked by simply changing his thoughts.
“Not only did these scans tell us that the patient was not in a vegetative state but, more importantly, for the first time in five years it provided the patient with a way of communicating his thoughts to the outside world.
“We can be pretty confident that he is entirely conscious. He has to understand the instructions, comprehend speech, and then make a decision.”
He added: “Obviously this fits into the issue of when patients should be allowed to die.”

Followers