I am sick of reading news accounts that make a point of
saying someone is an adopted son or daughter of so and so. This is coming up
again in the recent news accounts of the
feud between Michael (right) and Ron Reagan Jr(left). Every single news accounts makes it
a point to say that Michael is the adopted son as if to infer he is less of a son
than Ron Jr.
This piece of information adds nothing to the point of the
story and the inference that being
adopted makes you less of a child than one born biologically services to stigmatize adoption.
The news media should use their
platform appropriately and not continue to this message. Adoption is an event and not a lifelong label.
One mother of three children voiced it
this way; whether they arrived by Delta
or the delivery room they are all my children.
1 comment:
Hard core pro-aborts are NOT pro-choice. They hate any choice except abortion. So they naturally hate adoption, which is in competition with abortion. Hard core pro-aborts resent that, especially if they're making money off of abortion.
Yes, constantly announcing that someone is the adopted child serves to stigmatize adoption. But that's exactly what the hard core pro-aborts want to do. They want to turn the public off towards adoption, so that people will not see it as an option. Then they can sell abortion more easily, both to the public and to the scared, pregnant teenager in the clinic whose not sure how she wants to handle her pregnancy.
The MSM is in the pocket of the abortion industry.
Post a Comment