China's policy repugnant then why fund them via UNFPA?

Direct question deserves a direct answer.

Women's Rights without Frontiers acknowledges that Biden and his boss Obama are trying to walk back statements by Biden on China's one child policy. They acknowledge that this policy includes forced sterilizations  and abortions and even call it repugnant. Well the follow up question hits straight to the heart of issue with the question."

 

"If China’s Forced Abortion Is “Repugnant,” Why Are You Funding UNFPA?" We await the answer.

Countries that offer free abortions now in population decline...so how is that working out for you?

 Slate  prints an article about countries with serious population decline and ways they are trying to make up the difference such as Russia.

In May, Vladimir Putin, alarmed at Russia's declining population, which is falling thanks to short life expectancy and a plummeting birthrate (1.17 children per woman, down from about 2 in 1990), offered a bonus of 250,000 rubles (about $9,200) to women who would have a second child.

But for developed nations, the birthrates may have dropped too far. Europe and Japan face a shortage of children that endangers pensioners and undermines economic dynamism. Even China is facing a labor shortage, thanks to its one-child policy.

I have written several times about the declining population in Russia and how they are now doing a 360  to try to turn things around. Even the Russian Orthodox Church is waking up.

So to Ted Turner who said they the world should emulate China's One Child policy because too many children are killing the planet to our own Vice President "understanding" China's one child policy this is what abortion does for you.  How is that choice working out for you?

Chinese Human Rights Abusers — House Bill May Deny Entry into the U.S.

Cross Posted from Women's Rights without Frontiers blog

If passed, H.R. 2121, the “China Democracy Promotion Act of 2011,” would enable the President to deny entry into the U.S. for Chinese nationals who have “committed human rights abuses” against people in China, including anyone who “has participated in the imposition of . . . China’s coercive birth limitation policy.”  Under this wide-ranging bill, the President would also have discretion to deny entry to Chinese nationals who have participated in a wide range of human rights abuses.

Reggie Littlejohn, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, stated, “Decades ago, Congress barred foreign persecutors from obtaining asylum in the United States, to keep out Nazi war criminals.  Why should Chinese officials who force women to have abortions, persecute ethnic minorities, torture people for their religious beliefs, repress public interest lawyers and jail journalists be welcomed to our land?  These persecutors need to be held accountable.  They do not deserve to set foot on U.S. soil.”

Passage of this bill, however, may not be enough.  The key player is the President.  Even if the bill passes, will President Obama take a strong stand for the suffering people of China and deny entry to their persecutors?  Littlejohn stated, “Nothing in his record thus far indicates that President Obama would deny entry to Chinese government persecutors, at least where the One Child Policy is concerned.  To the contrary, President Obama restored funding to UNFPA, which former Secretary of State Colin Powell found to be working hand in hand with the Chinese coercive family planning machine.   

 And on his official visit, Vice President Biden just told China ‘Your policy has been one which I fully understand — I’m not second-guessing — of one child per family.’  If Biden ‘fully understands’ the One Child Policy, then he understands it is enforced through forced abortion.  If he is ‘not second-guessing’ it, then he is not opposing it.”
The bill was introduced by Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), and is sponsored by Reps. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), Dan Burton (R-Ind.), and Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.).  Significantly, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) newly signed on as a co-sponsor, which increases the likelihood that the bill will move through the Committee.


Watch a video about forced abortion in China:

Sign a petition against forced abortion and sexual slavery in China:

Ashes to Ashes

I

By Michael Famirez at Townhall.com

I saw this on Jill Stanek's website. How true. It says it all, doesn't it. I would say he nailed it. Ashes are a sign of repentance as we are all sinners. But we are not to be proud of our sins!  What if we gave up abortion for Lent. How many lives saved! 40 x 4000=160000!